Team Stages - Introduction

                                                         Navigating the Future ... Setting a Course for Excellence 

                                    

   ¯¯¯¯¯¯

   5 Dynamic Modules

   Home

 

   Team Stages

   Overview

   Introduction

   Scoring

   Forming

   Storming

   Norming

   Performing

   Adjourning

 

   TeamMark

   Overview

   Introduction

   Predictions

   Characteristics

   Team Profile

   Similarities

   Combinations

   Team Type

   Leader Type

   Decision Making

 

   TeamStyle

   Introduction

   Overview

   Definitions

   Characteristics

   In Organizations

   TeamStyle Report

   Interacting

   Team Profile

   Strengths

   Congruency

   Leadership

   Perceptions

   How Others' View

   Action Steps

   Your Manager

 

   TeamView

    Overview

   Issue Identification

   Cognitive Mapping

   Solution Feedback

   Qualitative Data

   Quantitative Data

   Data Analysis/Reporting

 

   Team Tools

   Tools/Resources

   Team Issues

   Coaching Teams

 

   Contact Us

   Request a Live Demo

   of our dynamic online 

   Talent Management &

   Competency System

   Call: 1-877-311-5530

   Link to Website

 

 

 

   

Introduction

     

From extensive research in group dynamics and the process of team building, we know a great deal about how teams operate.  Theory on team development predicts that teams, like individuals, pass through predictable stage over time.  The most well known model is that of Bruce Tuckman.

    

In 1965, Bruce Tuckman published his famous model.  Tuckman’s model identifies four distinct stages within a group’s life.  In his studies of team behaviors, Tuckman described the stages as:

Forming

Storming

Norming

Performing

      

Final Stage

Teams have a finite life, a final stage.  They form for a specific purpose and must disband once their mission is complete.  Consequently, there is a fifth and final stage, sometimes called

   

Adjourning

       

Stages Reflect Two Aspects

The stages reflect two aspects or orientations of team development:

1.  The tasks the team takes on, and

2.  The interpersonal group process.

    

Things to Remember

Each stage is characteristically different and builds on the preceding one.

  

The linear progression of team development as described is not always sequential.

  

Teams cycle through the stages over and over depending on the make-up of the team.

  

Change in leadership or team members require returning to the forming stage.

  

Also, not paying attention to the important development steps at any one stage will cause the team to revert to that stage.

  

A successful group is one that can move deftly back and forth between these stages as circumstances change.

  

While the obvious goal is to get to the Performing stage as soon as possible, it is a fruitless exercise to attempt to skip stages in the development of the group.  Although groups attempt it regularly, the result is a general distrust of groups and an assumption that a group will be unproductive.

     

Duration and Intensity          

The duration and intensity of these stages vary from one team to the next.  It may take months for one team to reach the performing stage, while another team is “performing” within a few weeks.  Knowing that it is normal for a team to go through these stages will help your team understand and anticipate the process, and take action to build a more productive relationship.

   

The teaming process can be compared to a roller coaster ride.  Progress will often proceed from climbing to stalling to falling.  Feelings may go from excited, as the project begins; to bored or impatient, as team members realize the enormity of the project; to encouraged, as useful data and information are gathered; to frustrated, as a team meets roadblocks and has to formulate a new plan.

  

The Ryan Group - Leaders in Human Capital Management Solutions

Copyright © 2006 The Ryan Group, Inc.